View more from News & Articles or Primerus Weekly

As workplaces increasingly adopt AI and automated systems, new legal challenges are emerging around employee injuries caused by these technologies. In the U.S., workers injured by AI-powered or automated equipment generally have two main avenues for recourse: filing a workers' compensation claim or, in limited circumstances, pursuing a civil lawsuit. Understanding these options, along with the responsibilities of employers and manufacturers, is essential for protecting legal rights.

Workers’ Compensation: The First Line of Protection

Workers’ compensation is a no-fault system designed to provide employees with benefits for medical expenses and lost wages following workplace injuries, regardless of fault.

  • Coverage for most injuries: Whether an accident results from equipment malfunction, AI misbehavior, or human error, workers’ compensation usually covers medical treatment and wage replacement.
  • Limits on civil lawsuits: Accepting workers’ compensation benefits generally prevents employees from suing their employer for negligence, offering a predictable system of support in exchange for giving up the right to civil litigation.

Product Liability Claims

When an AI system or automated machine malfunctions due to a defect, employees may have the right to pursue a product liability claim against the manufacturer, software developer, or system integrator.

  • Strict liability: Product liability often does not require proving negligence. Instead, claims focus on whether the product was defective in design, manufacturing, or warnings and whether that defect caused the injury.
  • “Black box” challenge: AI’s opaque algorithms can make it difficult to determine exactly why a system failed, complicating liability cases.
  • Potential defendants: Claims may be directed at hardware manufacturers, software developers, or the companies that integrated AI systems into their operations.

Employer Negligence

In certain cases, an employer may face a negligence claim if they fail to provide a safe workplace or contribute to an AI-related accident.

  • Duty of care: Employers are legally obligated to maintain a safe environment, even when advanced technologies are involved.
  • Examples of potential negligence:
    • Inadequate training on AI or automated systems.
    • Failure to implement safety barriers, emergency protocols, or maintenance routines.
    • Improper setup or misuse of automated systems.
    • Deliberate disabling of safety features to increase efficiency.

Regulatory Oversight

Although AI technology is evolving faster than regulations, agencies like OSHA hold employers accountable for maintaining safe workplaces.

  • General Duty Clause: Employers must protect workers from recognized hazards likely to cause serious injury or death.
  • Required safeguards: OSHA encourages measures such as physical barriers, fail-safes, and active human oversight of AI systems.
  • Transparency and governance: Employers are advised to clearly communicate AI use to workers and maintain oversight mechanisms.

Proving Negligence in AI Injury Cases

Traditional negligence requires showing four elements: duty, breach, causation, and damages. Applying these concepts to AI introduces unique challenges:

  • Duty: Developers and employers must exercise reasonable care, including safe AI design and proper workplace protocols.
  • Breach: Negligence may involve faulty software design or unsafe operational practices.
  • Causation: Plaintiffs must show the breach directly caused the injury, which can be difficult when AI systems evolve over time.
  • Damages: Compensable harm includes medical expenses, lost wages, and pain or suffering.

Challenges Specific to AI

  • Black box problem: Complex AI systems can make it difficult to trace failures to a specific defect.
  • Causation and foreseeability: Continuous learning and unpredictable behavior complicate the ability to demonstrate a direct link between an action and an injury.
  • Multiple parties: Responsibility may be distributed among software developers, hardware manufacturers, integrators, and employers.
  • Unclear standard of care: Emerging technologies often lack established legal standards, making breach assessments complex.

Evidence in AI-Related Claims

Successful claims often rely on a combination of:

  • Technical analysis: Expert reviews of software logs, system data, and AI algorithms.
  • Corporate records: Documentation of design, testing, and safety protocols.
  • Employer records: Training logs, maintenance records, and safety audits.
  • Witness testimony: Accounts from coworkers and supervisors.
  • Regulatory violations: Evidence of noncompliance with OSHA or industry safety standards.

Psychological and Non-Physical Injuries

AI-related work can also lead to psychological harm. For example, a 2025 class-action lawsuit in California alleged that AI trainers experienced mental distress from exposure to harmful content. Such cases highlight the evolving legal landscape surrounding mental injuries from AI-related tasks.

Examples of AI and Automated Equipment Injuries

  • Autonomous vehicles: Incidents involving Cruise and Tesla’s Autopilot system illustrate product liability and regulatory scrutiny after collisions and fatalities.
  • Industrial robots: Injuries at Tesla factories and international manufacturing plants show risks of malfunctioning robotic arms and the importance of safety protocols.
  • Warehouse automation: Reports from companies like Amazon link increased repetitive stress injuries to interactions with automated robots, raising potential liability concerns.

As AI and automated equipment become more prevalent in workplaces, the legal landscape surrounding employee injuries is evolving. Workers should understand their rights under workers’ compensation, the potential for product liability claims, and circumstances in which employer negligence may apply. These cases are complex, often involving multiple parties, sophisticated technology, and emerging regulatory expectations. Proper documentation, expert analysis, and awareness of legal responsibilities are essential for navigating AI-related workplace injuries.

Primerus Law Firms That Can Help with AI and Automated Equipment Injuries

Navigating the legal complexities of injuries caused by AI or automated equipment can be challenging. Primerus law firms connect you with experienced attorneys who understand emerging technology, workers’ compensation, product liability, and employer negligence claims. The firms listed below specialize in helping employees protect their rights and seek the compensation they deserve.