background image
46
T H E P R I M E R U S P A R A D I G M | C e l e b r a t i n g 2 5 y e a r s w i t h t h e w o r l d ' s f i n e s t l a w f i r m s
Risks to the Community vs. Confidential
Medical Care: A Challenge Not Yet Solved
Although decided more than 30 years
ago, many lawyers will remember the
Tarasoff case,
1
which saw the Supreme
Court of California called upon to consider
the limits of a patient's expectation of
confidentiality when seeking advice
from a health professional. As recent
developments in Australia show, the
balancing exercise between confidentiality
and the patient's potential risk to the
community has become no easier, and its
significance may now be heightened by
the scope for the risk to the community
to be a risk of terrorist activity affecting
many, rather than a risk to an individual.
In
Tarasoff, the patient Mr. Poddar
was a graduate student who had formed
a relationship with Ms. Tarasoff. Her
views regarding the relationship were
not the same as those of Mr. Poddar. He
apparently began to stalk her and he
became increasingly depressed. He came
under the care of a psychologist to whom
he confided his plan to kill Ms. Tarasoff.
In due course he was detained for mental
health reasons, before being released. The
psychologist did not warn Ms.Tarasoff of
the risk to her, and she was ultimately
killed by Mr. Poddar.
The litigation was brought by the
parents of the late Ms. Tarasoff, alleging
negligence on the part of the psychologist
and others who had treated Mr. Poddar.
It was ultimately successful, with the
majority of the Court holding that the
public policy favoring protection of
the confidential character of patient-
psychotherapist communications must
yield to the extent to which disclosure is
essential to avert danger to others. The
protective privilege ends where the public
peril begins.
The
Tarasoff decision is well known
through much of the legal world. It has a
page on Wikipedia.
2
Some 30 years later,
the challenge posed by Tarasoff has not
disappeared.
In April 2017, a Coroner in the
State of Victoria, Australia, published
findings in an inquest into the death of
Ms. Adriana Donato in 2012.
3
Ms. Donato
had formed a relationship with a former
school friend, James, which she ultimately
ended. James did not cope well and came
under the care of a psychologist. In a
sad parallel to the Tarasoff matter, he
ultimately stabbed and killed Ms. Donato.
Asia Pacific ­ Australia
Bill Madden is special counsel with Carroll
& O'Dea Lawyers. He is an Adjunct Fellow at
the Western Sydney University, School of Law
and writes a medical and health law blog:
billmaddens.wordpress.com/ (also on twitter
@billmadden.com). Soon to be released is a third
edition of Bill's co-authored book "Australian
Medical Liability," published by LexisNexis.
Justine Anderson, Carroll & O'Dea Lawyers,
assisted in the preparation of this article.
Carroll & O'Dea Lawyers
Level 18, St James Centre
111 Elizabeth Street
Sydney NSW 2000
Australia
+61 2 9291 7100 Phone
bill_madden@codea.com.au
codea.com.au
Bill Madden