background image
12
T H E P R I M E R U S P A R A D I G M | C e l e b r a t i n g 2 5 y e a r s w i t h t h e w o r l d ' s f i n e s t l a w f i r m s
The Defend Trade Secrets Act: Year One
One of the most significant developments
in the area of trade secrets is the recent
passage of the federal Defend Trade Secrets
Act (DTSA). Until 2016, trade secrets
were the exception to the federal approach
to protecting intellectual property. In this
article, we give an overview of the DTSA,
compare it to the Georgia Trade Secrets
Act (GTSA), and note some of the case law
developments in the first year since the
DTSA's passage. While state law on trade
secrets varies widely, a comparison of the
DTSA to the GTSA will illustrate some of
the possible nuances in the pre-DTSA state
trade secrets regimes.
1
Applying to misconduct occurring after
May 11, 2016,
2
the DTSA amends the
Economic Espionage Act of 1996 to create
a federal private civil cause of action for
theft or misappropriation of trade secrets,
provided the trade secret "is related to a
product or service used in, or intended for
use in, interstate or foreign commerce."
3
Like the origins of the GTSA, the DTSA was
Congress' much-anticipated response to the
growing problem and harm caused by trade
secret theft. The DTSA passed with nearly
unanimous congressional support.
The DTSA does not preempt existing
state law, and so it will not preempt the
GTSA.
4
Unlike the GTSA, it also does not
preempt separate claims for tort, restitution
or other civil remedies under Georgia law
for misappropriation of trade secrets. Rather,
the DTSA exists alongside state law and
is a separate cause of action that provides
additional protection for businesses' trade
secrets.
Like the GTSA, the DTSA prohibits the
actual or threatened misappropriation of
trade secrets, and it provides for a number
of remedies, including: ex parte seizure;
5
injunctive relief; actual damages; damages
North America ­ United States
Jeff Horst has a business litigation practice
encompassing appeals, business torts, contracts,
corporate governance, covenants not to compete,
employment, entertainment, franchise, insurance
coverage, intellectual property, officer and director
liability, professional liability, securities litigation,
shareholder disputes and trade secrets.
Michael Boutros handles a wide variety of business and
complex litigation in the areas of business torts, appeals,
contract, intellectual property, corporate governance,
restrictive covenants, securities and trade secrets.
Cameron Ellis is a litigator who regularly represents
companies, business owners and high-level executives
in business disputes, particularly disputes involving
non-competition agreements, trade secrets and
corporate governance.
Krevolin & Horst, LLC
1201 West Peachtree Street
One Atlantic Center, Suite 3250
Atlanta, Georgia 30309
404.585.3657 Phone
horst@khlawfirm.com
boutros@khlawfirm.com
ellis@khlawfirm.com
khlawfirm.com
Jeff Horst
Cameron Ellis
Michael Boutros