Involved? contractor is hired to complete a work, that contractor may automatically retain ownership therein and to the copyright in the work. Take the example above. Although you hired a third-party software developer specifically to create software for your machinery, you may not be the legal owner of that software absent a specific agreement to that effect. When determining whether a contributing party is an independent contractor, the follow- ing factors, although not dispositive of the issue, are important considerations: lar business of the employed; and/or tools and place of work? True to most issues involving copyright law, courts are not consistent in their application of the factors, though the inconsistencies provide endless fodder for law review articles. Consequently, any application of these factors to a particular set of facts is problematic and unpredictable. Much of this uncertainty can be avoided by addressing the owner- ship of the copyright on the front end of a development project. Implementation of a simple and straightforward agreement (or the addition of well-planned copy- right clauses in the underlying contract) can avoid such eventual headaches, heartaches and litigation expenses required to determine copyright owner- ship in the courts. As a precautionary measure, you should always execute a written and signed work-for-hire agreement with all third-party contributors. Such an agree- in and to the commissioned work, and prepared on your behalf, will be exclu- sively owned by you. As a "catch-all" ap- proach, it is also a good idea to include an overarching copyright assignment clause in the agreement itself rather than relying on the creator executing an as- signment after the project is completed. If the relationship between you and the creator of the work you commissioned is such that it does not meet the require- ments for a work-for-hire relationship, such a copyright assignment will transfer title to you up front and, most impor- tantly, without additional payment or negotiations. rights in a Preexisting work? is often a "derivative work" that is based upon one or more preexisting works. Derivative works are extremely common in these industries and the existence of preexisting works should always be considered when you hire a software developer to create computer or software programming. For example, because the rights in and to a derivative work extend only to the "new material" created and not to the preexisting work, the scope of the copyright in the derivative work may be limited. Additionally, the rights to the preexisting work are retained by the original author thereby potentially subjecting you to liability for using or misappropriating the preexisting works. This alleged exploitation of the deriva- tive work may, therefore, subject you to liability for copyright infringement, an award of monetary damages, and the prohibition of future use. Has Anyone offered to Publish the work? artist, writer or musician) it is critical that you truly understand the nature of the "deal." Entire industries are devoted to the purchase of copyright interests in and to literary and musical works in exchange for marketing and "deal promoters) kick back a portion of any deal they procure to the artist, writer or musician in the form of royalties. While promoter-based deals are good for some creative types, particularly those who are not interested in "the business of it all," they may not be a good fit for everyone. It is important for you to be counseled and advised of the limitations of your remain- ing rights and the possibility of never receiving a royalty payment even if the promoter inks a deal. A great and shining example of an artist who maintained control of the copyright in and to her work is J.K. Rowling, author of the acclaimed you cannot find Harry Potter on iTunes for download. You must go to an e- commerce site set up by Rowling herself (http://www.pottermore.com/), one in which she retains a large proportion of the purchase price, in order to download and listen to audio versions of her books. While an author may want to enter into a deal with a promoter for the written book, the copyright in and to the audible ver- sion or the movie rights may be retained by the author. These examples are just a taste of the many ways in which a copyright can be divided and subdivided for licensing or marketing purposes. This is a strategy brilliantly used by Rowling which has allowed her to maintain for herself many of the rights and opportuni- ties routinely given away by authors. deal is done," it is critical to ask your- self, "With whom am I working?" In law, just as in medicine, the same principle applies "prevention is the best medi- cine" and, with collaborative endeavors as with medicine, the precautions you take at the outset may make all the dif- ference in the outcome or recuperation (legal battle) that ensues. |